A federal judge has declined to block Elon Musk‘s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing Treasury Department systems, despite ongoing privacy concerns.

Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the D.C. District Court ruled against unions seeking a preliminary injunction, finding insufficient evidence of immediate, irreparable harm.

The decision creates a bizarre legal tangle. Another judge in New York already blocked DOGE’s access through a temporary restraining order. So practically speaking? Nothing changes.

DOGE, created by Trump’s Executive Order 14158, has been controversial from day one. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent initially gave Musk’s team “full access” to sensitive systems containing personal data of millions of Americans. Social Security numbers, bank accounts – the works.

That didn’t sit well with everyone. Unions representing government employees and retirees filed lawsuits faster than you could say “privacy violation.” Their fears weren’t exactly unfounded.

Treasury’s own internal assessment reportedly called DOGE access “the single biggest insider threat” the Bureau of Fiscal Service ever faced. Not exactly a ringing endorsement.

The saga took another weird turn when Marko Elez, one of only two DOGE employees initially granted access, left after facing accusations of emailing an unencrypted Treasury database.

Oh, and there were those pesky racist social media posts too.

Judge Jeannette Vargas in New York was less forgiving than her D.C. counterpart. She extended her restraining order, calling the access process “chaotic and haphazard” and “arbitrary and capricious.” Strong words.

Judge Vargas recently lifted part of her injunction, allowing one staff member named Ryan Wunderly limited access after he completed required training.

Meanwhile, government watchdogs have launched audits. The Treasury’s Inspector General wants answers. The GAO is investigating.

The Alliance for Retired Americans joined the Administrative Procedure Act lawsuit among the multiple legal challenges filed against DOGE since Trump’s return to office.

The fundamental question remains unanswered: How much access should political appointees have to Americans’ personal financial data?

And should that access be granted before proper vetting and security protocols are in place?

For now, the legal battle continues. DOGE’s Treasury hunt is temporarily leashed, despite the D.C. judge’s ruling.